|

|
 |
|
Widows Hit Hard by SBP-DIC Offset |
|
| Fall 2005
Print |
Congress has been working to
increase benefits for military survivors, especially those of
servicemembers killed in the war on terrorism in Afghanistan and
Iraq. The changes have increased lump-sum benefits, which will pay
immediate expenses, maintain housing and schooling continuity, and
upgrade resources for future education needs for deceased
servicemembers’ children — an encouraging step in the right
direction.
What still must be addressed is the monthly annuity that will
sustain a military survivor in the long term. This annuity is
important to both the survivors of servicemembers killed on active
duty and the survivors of retirees who die of a service-connected
cause.
One of MOAA’s top goals in 2005 is to end the deduction of VA
survivor benefits from Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) annuities. For
all active duty deaths, the surviving spouse is entitled to
Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) — currently $993 a month
paid by the VA. The spouse also is entitled to benefits from SBP.
But the law requires dollar-for-dollar deduction of DIC payments
from SBP benefits. For survivors of members below the E-6 grade,
this offset wipes out most or all of the SBP entitlement, leaving
survivors with only the $993 a month from the VA. For more senior
members, the survivor receives some residual SBP — but loses almost
$12,000 a year in benefits.
Survivors of retirees who die as the result of a service-connected
cause also are entitled to DIC. If SBP-eligible, they also suffer a
dollar-for-dollar offset, even if the retiree paid years of SBP
premiums. The surviving spouse receives a partial SBP premium
refund, but with no interest. MOAA thinks DIC is what its name
implies — a special indemnity payable when military service causes
the servicemember’s premature death. SBP is retiree-purchased
insurance. The survivor should receive both when military service
caused the death.
Substituting DIC for SBP is inappropriate. Federal civilians have
their own SBP program, and federal civilian SBP is not subject to
offset by DIC if the civilian is a veteran and dies from a
service-connected cause.
Members of Congress are beginning to recognize this inequity. Sen.
Bill Nelson (D-Fla.) has introduced
S. 185 to repeal the SBP-DIC
offset. Rep. Henry Brown (R-S.C.) has introduced similar legislation
(H.R. 808) in the House.
President George W. Bush heard about the problem earlier this year
when a group of widows at Fort Hood, Texas, gave him an earful about
the unfair offset. The president asked his aides to find out more.
Nelson sent the president a letter pointing out the solution to the
problem in his bill,
S. 185.
Congress has taken a step in the right direction by increasing
lump-sum death benefits for new survivors. But that does not help
most current survivors. We must end the SBP-DIC offset.
Family Issues
Are a Priority for the National Guard
The events of Sept. 11, 2001,
increased the country’s service demands on the National Guard and
Reserve. With more frequent deployments, changes in medical care,
and extra requirements for family support, the National Guard is
working to upgrade its commitment to family members.
The recent National Guard Family Action Plan (GFAP) Mid-Level
Conference aimed at identifying problem areas within the Guard and
Reserve family support system. At the top of the list was
post-deployment counseling for servicemembers and their families.
Attendees emphasized the need for confidential, semi-annual
counseling, administered by mental health professionals and
supported by commanders. They also cited a need for more government
incentives for employers, income protection, and corporate
financial-assistance programs to resolve financial hardships. Other
needs include standardized reintegration of family support services
between the Air Force and Army National Guard; adequate and
affordable child care during inactive training periods; and the
inclusion of parents and extended family in readiness and
pre-mobilization briefings.
Army-specific issues will be integrated with other family items to
be addressed at the Army Family Action Plan Conference this fall.
For more information, visit the Guard Family Action Plan online at
http://www.gfap.org.
|
 |
|