| OBSERVATION POST |
|
Making That Special Bond |
|
By Tom Philpott
July 2004
|
Volunteer troops still look for leaders, not benefactors.
In 1980,
Ronald Reagan campaigned for the presidency promised to rearm
America and fill out a hollow force. He would begin by closing a
"pay gap" between the military and private sector.
On the day of
Reagan's inauguration, Iran released American hostages. Soon
thereafter, true to his word, the new president proposed—and
Congress later enacted—an average 14.3 percent military pay raise.
Because the
increase came atop an 11.7 percent pay raise and new variable
housing allowances Congress had approved the previous year, for
which Jimmy Carter unsuccessfully tried to take credit, the pay gap
quickly was closed. What a first impression Reagan made on troops.
From that
point forward, it seemed, nothing could sway the positive perception
among service people that this was their commander in chief.
It held
through troubling times, too, including a terrorist attack that
killed 241 U.S. sailors and Marines in Lebanon in 1983, for which
Reagan accepted responsibility, and the Iran-Contra scandal, which
revealed White House officials had traded arms for American hostages
and diverted the profits illegally to support Contra rebels in
Nicaragua. Reagan was slow to perceive the depth of that mess.
Reagan's
popularity with service people also held despite a string of annual
pay raises that soon created a new pay gap. By the time he left
office in 1989, military pay had fallen 9 percent behind wage growth
in the private sector, a disparity almost as large as when he
arrived.
The president
also had signed a defense bill that substantially reduced the value
of military retirement for future servicemembers.
It was a far
different military by then, however. Reagan had backed up his
anti-Soviet rhetoric with billions and billions of dollars spent on
new weapons programs and technology. A panting "evil empire," with
its moribund economy, was unable to keep pace and the groundwork was
laid for a Cold War victory.
If military
people felt underpaid again by the late 1980s, they tended to blame
Congress, not Reagan. Military people bond with a president—at least
some presidents—but not with Congress.
That's true
even though lawmakers, lobbied effectively by service and veterans
organizations, deserve far more credit than do presidents, including
Reagan, for the competitiveness of military compensation.
During the
post-Cold War draw down, for example, it was Congress that, over
objections from the first Bush administration, created a stout
transition package for members forced or enticed from service.
During both Gulf Wars, it was Congress, not either Bush
administration, that pushed for wartime-related special pay
increases.
The Clinton
administration didn't propose real improvements in military pay and
benefits until the services suffered a recruiting and retention
crisis in the late 1990s. It did finally commit to phasing out
out-of-pocket rental costs with a string of extra increases in
housing allowances. But the Joint Chiefs of Staff ultimately had to
count on Congress and the work of service associations to win a
series of bigger annual pay raises, roll back 1986 retirement cuts,
and create TRICARE for Life for older retirees.
Both Reagan
and George W. Bush replaced Democratic presidents who had checkered
reputations for supporting the troops. Reagan took full advantage of
it. Bush has not. Ironically, Congress, in continuing to lead on
military compensation issues, hasn't helped the president's image.
The
administration message heard often these days is to stop entitlement
grow within the defense budget. Like all past administrations, it
argued against lifting the ban on concurrent receipt of military
retirement and disability benefits. It argues now against proposals
to open TRICARE to drilling reservists and to enhance military
survivor benefits.
It remains to
be seen whether George W. Bush is fusing a special bond with
military people. Iraq, with its casualties and costs, makes that
more difficult. But the bond was there for the Gipper even as pay
raises ebbed.
Tom Philpott is a freelance writer and syndicated news columnist. His column, "Military Update," appears in 48 daily newspapers throughout the United States and overseas.
|