Why Should You Join?

MOAA members have access to services specifically designed for them.

Join Secondary page

MOAA President Vice Adm. Norb Ryan, Jr. defends earned benefits of military families on panel

Increase size Decrease size Text Size PrintPrint

May 8, 2012

 

Alexandria, Va. (May 8,) — Military Officers Association of America (MOAA) President Vice Adm. Norb Ryan, Jr. participated on a panel today entitled “The Future of Military Compensation: Equity vs. Affordability“ at the Center for American Progress (CAP).  Ryan made it clear that military retirement and healthcare programs are vastly different from other federal entitlement programs.  He said the programs are earned compensation for extended service to our country.  

The debate  was over a new CAP study that recommends cutting back on military pay raises, converting military retirement to a contributory 401(k)-style system, and dramatically increasing TRICARE fees for military retirees, among other things.

Joining Ryan on the panel was Maj. Gen. Arnold L. Punaro (USMCR-Ret.), a member of the Defense Business Board and Michael J. Bayer, former Chairman of the Defense Business Board, whose 2011 report recommended major cutbacks in military retirement.  The panel was moderated by Lawrence Korb (USNR), Senior Fellow for CAP and former Assistant Secretary of Defense for Manpower, Reserve Affairs, Installations and Logistics.

Bayer said, “Until personnel costs are wrestled down to manageable levels, there won’t be enough to fund other defense needs.”  He advocated a radical overhaul of what he asserted is “an archaic system of [military] pay and benefits,” noting that 83% of military people leave service without any benefit.

Punaro said he agrees with MOAA that we don’t want to return to the “erosion of benefits” era of the late 1970s, but argued for significant benefit cuts for future entrants.  He noted that military retirees’ life expectancy will continue to rise another 6 to 8 years, “creating another huge financial burden for the country.”

VADM Ryan countered that Defense leaders are “missing the forest for the trees” on these issues, and the real focus should be on sustaining needed incentives for the 17% to stay rather than whacking their benefits to help the 83% who choose to leave.  “There’s a reason only 17% stay for a career,” he said, citing the huge sacrifices inherent in a military career.  “The 83% don’t leave with nothing,” he said.  “Congress approved a GI Bill worth upwards of $80,000 per person, to help them with that transition.”  He noted a 20-year NCO earns retired pay of only $23,000, and that proposing big pay, retirement, and healthcare cutbacks “dishonor their service.”