|
|
 |

Death Benefits Rise
Senate, House leaders confer on emergency spending
bill provisions to increase active duty SGLI and death gratuity and
add traumatic injury rider, among other initiatives.
On April 28, House and Senate conferees met to begin negotiations
to resolve the differences between the separate versions of the FY
2005 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations Bill (H.R. 1268) passed
by the two chambers. Negotiators had hoped to finish their work
quickly, but at press time, the Senate had gone into recess until
May 9.
Spending Bill Highlights
* Among other things, H.R. 1268
would: * raise maximum military
life insurance coverage to $400,000 for future active duty deaths;
* raise the military death
gratuity to $100,000 for members who die of combat- or
operations-related causes; and
* authorize a $100,000 traumatic
injury insurance rider.
The House and Senate versions remained about $2 billion apart, with
the House adding more than the president requested for equipment for
the Army and Marine Corps and the Senate adding $500 million more
for survivor benefits but cutting funds in other areas.
Both versions would raise the death gratuity to $100,000 for some or
all survivors of all servicemembers killed on active duty after the
new law is enacted. Both bills also would raise maximum
Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI) coverage to $400,000
(versus the current $250,000). The Senate version would have the
government pay the premiums for the first $150,000 in coverage for
servicemembers serving in a combat zone.
Both the House and Senate plans have a retroactive provision that
would pay a special death gratuity based on the new amounts to
certain survivors of servicemembers killed after Oct. 7, 2001, the
start of the war on terrorism. The House version would pay an
additional $88,000 death gratuity to such survivors if the death was
due to conditions incurred in Iraq or Afghanistan. The Senate would
pay the additional $88,000 to survivors of almost all servicemembers
killed after Oct. 7, 2001. The added $88,000 would make up the
difference between the $12,000 already paid and the new $100,000
limit.
The House also would provide an additional $150,000 to the survivors
of servicemembers who died “in performance of military duty” since
Oct. 7, 2001. The Senate version would pay the extra $150,000 only
if the servicemember were killed as a result of combat, training for
combat, hazardous duty, or an instrumentality of war.
The intent of the $150,000 payment is to make the SGLI increase
retroactive for this group. Since SGLI coverage can’t be purchased
for someone who already is deceased, the Pentagon would pay the
amount as a special death gratuity. The Senate version also would:
- express the (nonbinding) sense of Congress that DoD should
pay full concurrent receipt to disabled servicemembers rated
“unemployable” by the VA;
- provide federal civilian employees who are mobilized
reservists the difference between their federal pay and military
compensation (this would be part of their civilian pay, not
their military pay, and would be comparable to what some
civilian employers already do for their mobilized employees);
- authorize family travel to visit servicemembers hospitalized
in the United States; and
- authorize a traumatic-injury rider to SGLI that would pay up
to $100,000 for loss of various physical capabilities.
TFL Under Fire
MOAA speaks out against attacks on health benefits.
Weapons vs. Benefits Debate
Some say rising retiree health costs are crimping other defense needs.
MOAA says we must have a defense budget that meets both weapons and
“people program” needs. Failing on either count hurts readiness.
On April 14 New York Times article headlined “A New Call To
Arms: Military Health Care” (www.moaa.org/legislative/41405nyt.asp)
made the case that the growing cost of TRICARE For Life (TFL)
will create growing pressures on the defense budget in the
“people vs. things” cost debate.
The article quoted DoD leaders and certain others in and out of
government as claiming that the rising cost of health care could
crowd out other defense needs.
But it also quoted Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman John
Warner (R-Va.) and MOAA Director of Government Relations Col.
Steve Strobridge, USAF-Ret., making the other side of the case:
The defense budget needs to be increased to meet government
obligations for both hardware and personnel — including TFL.
We’ll say again what we’ve said before: If the administration
will submit a budget to Congress requesting funds to cover both
needs, Congress will fund them. The chairmen of both the Senate
and House armed services committees have called for larger
defense budgets.
If DoD or the OMB is requiring trade-offs of any other defense
needs to meet military health care costs, that’s not right. It’s
not the intent of Congress, and it’s certainly not military
retirees’ fault.
TFL was authorized only five years ago because Congress
recognized that military retirees had earned and deserved
Medicare-supplement coverage that previously had been denied to
them. Rising health care costs are not unique to the military;
it’s a continuing issue for the entire country. But the U.S.
government should be a model employer, not a backsliding one,
especially when it comes to those who spent decades of service
and sacrifice defending the United States through multiple hot
and cold wars.
Those who contend there’s no readiness return on spending money
to treat retirees and survivors fairly have disturbingly short
memories. It wasn’t that long ago that the Joint Chiefs of Staff
were urging Congress to fix retiree health inequities because
they were hurting active duty retention. TFL is a health benefit
earned by years of service and sacrifice, and MOAA will fight to
protect it. COLA Watch
Inflation ticks up, but COLA still looks modest.
On April 20, the Bureau of Labor Statistics announced the
March value for the CPI, which is the metric used to calculate
the annual COLA for military retired pay, VA disability
compensation, survivor annuities, and Social Security.
After small increases in the CPI during the winter, inflation
has continued to rise slowly this year. The March CPI grew 0.7
percent above February, but remains only 1.9 percent above last
year’s COLA baseline.
We won’t know the final COLA until mid-October. MOAA will
continue to provide updates periodically through the summer and
fall MOAA Staff Transitions
Key lobbyist moves up and MOAA adds new talent.
Col. Mike Jordan, USAF-Ret., deputy director of MOAA’s
Government Relations Department since 2000, has been selected to
serve as MOAA’s new director of Contract Services and Marketing.
As MOAA’s principal lobbyist for active duty and retiree
compensation issues, Jordan played a key role in winning
concurrent receipt for disabled retirees, as well as enhanced
pay raises, homeowner capital gains tax relief, upgraded
relocation allowances, and voting rights protections for the
active duty force, among many other accomplishments. Now, MOAA
will take even greater advantage of his leadership and planning
skills in his important new position.
Col. Mike Hayden, USAF-Ret., will fill Jordan’s position as of
July 1, upon completion of a 25-year military career in air and
space operations, personnel, recruiting, training, and
education. Hayden’s most recent duty assignments were in the
Pentagon, as chief of the Military Personnel Policy Division, HQ
USAF, and as chief, Personnel Services Division for the Joint
Chiefs of Staff. In the latter position, he worked with MOAA in
winning Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) coverage for survivors of
servicemembers killed on active duty. He also has commanded an
Air Force recruiting squadron and compiled 2,800 flying hours as
a B-52 navigator/weapons systems officer. MOAA is pleased and
fortunate to welcome him to the government relations team.
Nelson Writes White House
SBP champ asks president to help end SBP-DIC offset.
Senate Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP) champion Sen. Bill Nelson
(D-Fla.) has sent President George W. Bush a letter urging his
support in ending the unfair SBP-Dependency and Indemnity
Compensation (DIC) offset that affects thousands of military
widows. The issue was one of several survivors’ issues raised by
a group of widows who met with the president during a visit to
Fort Hood, Texas.
Under current law, military survivors’ SBP entitlement is offset
dollar-for-dollar by the DIC annuity paid by the VA when the
death was caused by military service — currently $993 a month.
The unfair practice hit home with the widows of the war on
terrorism at Fort Hood, and they let the president know it.
Nelson’s letter to the White House noted that his bill, S. 185,
would fix the SBP-DIC offset and sought support for his
amendment to include this fix in the FY 2005 Emergency
Supplemental Appropriations Act. Nelson’s amendment was ruled
“non-germane” under expedited rules adopted by the Senate to
speed action on the supplemental funding bill.
Despite that temporary setback, work continues on building
cosponsor support for the legislation. Twenty-one cosponsors now
are on board S. 185, nearly double the number for a similar bill
in the 108th Congress. In the House, companion bills H.R. 808
(Rep. Henry Brown, R-S.C.) and H.R. 968 (Rep. Jim Saxton, R-N.J.)
also are ahead of last year’s cosponsorship numbers.
To help build momentum on these issues, please call your
legislators using MOAA’s toll-free Capitol Hill hot line at
(877) 762-8762. You also can send your senators and
representative an MOAA-suggested message by visiting MOAA’s Web
site.
On the Web
Log on to MOAA’s Web site to send a quick message to your
representatives at
http://capwiz.com/moaa/home. Click on “Cosponsor SBP Fixes.”
VA Disability Commission Gears Up
First meeting scheduled for May; report due in 2006.
What’s the VA Disability Commission?
When Congress authorized the present concurrent receipt law, it also
required a commission to review VA disability programs. As the
commission begins its work, a primary focus of its first meeting will be
on input from MOAA and other military and veterans’
associations.
The National Defense Authorization Act for 2004 (P.L.
108-136) established the Veterans Disability Benefits
Commission. Its charter is to conduct a study of the benefits
under U.S. law “to compensate and assist veterans and their
survivors for disabilities and deaths attributable to military
service.” Defense bill conferees agreed nearly two years ago to
establish the commission in connection withtheir approval of
concurrent receipt legislation and upgrades to the combat-
related special compensation program.
Of the 13 members of the commission, seven must hold a valor
decoration of the Silver Star or higher. To date, 11 members
have been appointed. Appointee Thomas Harvey recently resigned
to become a senior policy advisor to VA Secretary Jim Nicholson;
another appointee passed away last year and a replacement hasn’t
been named.
Lt. Gen. James T. Scott, USA-Ret., was appointed to the
commission by President George W. Bush and will chair the panel.
In order of appointment, the other members of the commission
are: Rick Surratt of Virginia; Vice Adm. Dennis V. McGinn, USN-Ret.;
Charles Joeckel of Washington, D.C.; Nick B. Bacon of Arkansas;
Donald M. Cassiday of Indiana; Lt. Cmdr. Jennifer Carroll, USN-Ret.;
John H. Grady of Texas;
Maj. Gen. James Livingston, USMC-Ret.; Col. Larry Brown,
USA-Ret.; and Joe Wynn of Washington, D.C.
The commission must report to the president and Congress within
15 months of its first meeting on May 9-10. In conducting its
work, the commission will evaluate and assess the laws and
regulations that determine eligibility for disability and death
benefits; assess compensation rates for such benefits based on
average impairment of earning capacity; and compare federal
disability benefits with those provided by state governments and
the private sector.
Representatives of MOAA and several other military and veterans’
organizations are scheduled to testify before the commission in
May. VA Issues on the Hill
MOAA testifies before veterans’ committees.
On April 14, Col. Bob Norton, USA-Ret., and Cmdr. John Class,
USN-Ret., deputy directors of MOAA’s Government Relations
Department, testified before a joint hearing of the House and
Senate veterans’ affairs committees on MOAA’s legislative
priorities for veterans’ health care and benefits.
Rep. Steve Buyer (R-Ind.) and Sen. Larry Craig (R-Idaho), newly
appointed chairmen of the House and Senate veterans’ affairs
committees, respectively, presided. Other groups also presented
their legislative agenda for veterans, including AMVETS, one of
MOAA’s partners in The Military Coalition.
Class addressed a number of VA health care issues, urging the
committees to:
- fully fund the VA Health Care System to meet a rising
demand and ensure appropriate access standards are met;
- renew efforts with the armed services committees to
direct and oversee a concerted DoD and VA effort to ensure
full and timely implementation of seamless transition
activities, including a bidirectional electronic medical
record, an electronic service separation document, and
enhanced post-deployment health screening; and
- expand mental health care services for veterans, their
families, and their survivors, including training programs
to help individuals know when to seek professional help.
Norton urged the committees to:
- fix the VA claims processing system (there continue to
be problems with consistency among the regional offices,
initial accuracy, and inefficiencies in processing claims);
- raise the Servicemembers’ Group Life Insurance (SGLI)
policy limit to $400,000 and increase the military death
gratuity to $100,000 to cover all deaths since Oct. 7, 2001,
deemed to be “in the line of duty”;
- place all active duty and Guard and Reserve Montgomery
GI Bill authorities under a single part of the U.S. Code —
Title 38 — so reserve benefits can be adjusted in proportion
to changes in active duty benefits; and
- hold a hearing to assess the need for further
improvements to reemployment rights rules for mobilized
reservists and to revisit the financial and legal
protections available under the Servicemembers Civil Relief
Act.
On the web
New Bills
Legislators propose additional benefit upgrades.
New legislation offered in recent weeks is aimed at
correcting inequities affecting disabled veterans and their
survivors, among others. Following is a summary of selected
bills of importance to MOAA members.
-
H.R. 2076 (Rep. Mike Bilirakis, R-Fla.) would expand
existing concurrent receipt eligibility to phase out the
disability offset over 10 years for members with 40
percent and lesser rated disabilities. It also would
require full, immediate concurrent receipt payments to
otherwise qualifying members rated as “unemployable” by
the VA.
- H.R. 1594 (Rep. Jeb Bradley, R-N.H.) would authorize
chiropractic care as a benefit for all TRICARE
beneficiaries. Currently, chiropractic care is
authorized under Medicare but not TRICARE.
- H.R. 1462 (Rep. Mike Bradley, R-Fla.) would allow
the survivors of servicemembers who died of
service-connected causes to retain eligibility for
VA-paid Dependency and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) if
they remarry after age 55. Currently, the DIC age limit
is 57, even though all other federal survivor annuity
programs set such eligibility at age 55.
- H.R. 1220 (Rep. Steve Buyer, R-Ind.) would authorize
an annual COLA for disabled veterans and DIC widows.
Unlike other federal annuity programs, VA COLAs require
annual legislation.
-
S. 487/H.R. 1373 (Sen. Ben Nelson, D-Neb./Rep.
Dennis Cardoza, D-Calif.) would allow a member of the
armed forces adopting a child in a qualifying child
adoption 21 days of leave in connection with the
adoption. A qualifying child adoption is one in which
the member is eligible for reimbursement of qualified
adoption expenses.
Use MOAA’s Web site (http://capwiz.com/moaa/issues/bill)
to check the status of key bills and urge your
legislators’ support. Third Rx
Tier is Here DoD takes next steps to implement
pharmacy copayment adjustments.
What’s the “Uniform Formulary?”
* TRICARE now offers drugs at $3 (generic) and $9 (brand name) copayment
rates.
* Selected drugs are being assigned a $22 “non-formulary” copayment if
others are equally effective and cost much less.
* The lower copayment still will apply if a doctor documents that the drug
is medically necessary.
DoD has announced the start of the uniform formulary
program, placing three medications on the third tier
(more expensive) “non-formulary” category. Starting July
17, the following medications will require a $22
copayment:
- Nexium for stomach problems and ulcers,
- Teveten and Teveten HCT for high blood pressure.
Depending on where the prescription is filled,
beneficiaries will pay $22 for a 30-day supply of
these medications from a TRICARE Retail Pharmacy (TRRx)
or a 90-day supply from the TRICARE Mail-Order
Pharmacy (TMOP). In non-network retail pharmacies,
the copayment will be $22 or 20 percent of the cost,
whichever is higher. Third-tier drugs will not be
stocked in military treatment facility (MTF)
pharmacies, but can be special-ordered if an MTF
physician (or a non-MTF physician to whom the
patient was referred) determines they are medically
necessary for a particular patient.
Beneficiaries who are taking Nexium, Teveten, or
Teveten HCT should check with their doctors to see
if a less-costly medication would be equally
effective. Providers who believe there is a valid
medical reason why a patient must take the
non-formulary third tier medication can request a
medical-necessity determination.
Beneficiaries who already have established medical
necessity for Nexium with the TMOP system must get
another medical-necessity determination by July 17
to continue receiving the medication at the $9
copayment. Beneficiaries without an updated
medical-necessity determination will have to pay the
$22 cost share.
Resources
Hill Leaders Tout Agenda
MOAA supports GI Bill of Rights for the 21st
Century.
House and Senate minority leaders invited MOAA
and others to participate in April events
highlighting military and veterans’ issues. As a
non-partisan organization, MOAA attends such events
when we are invited by either side of the aisle as
an opportunity to present the issues that are of
interest to our members.
MOAA Director of Government Relations Col. Steve
Strobridge, USAF-Ret., and Deputy Director Col. Bob
Norton, USA-Ret., represented MOAA at a press
conference on Capitol Hill in mid-April, when House
Democratic leaders introduced their proposed “GI
Bill of Rights for the 21st Century.”
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), along
with Reps. Ike Skelton (D-Mo.) and Lane Evans
(D-Ill.) and Gen. Wesley Clark, USA-Ret., introduced
the initiative. Skelton is the ranking member of the
House Armed Services Committee and Evans is the
ranking member of the House Veterans Affairs
Committee.
The GI Bill of Rights for the 21st Century would:
- eliminate the Survivor Benefit Plan (SBP)-Dependency
and Indemnity Compensation (DIC) offset
(referred to as the “Military Families Tax” at
the press conference);
- extend fee-based TRICARE to all members of
the National Guard and Reserve and their
families;
- increase VA health funding by $3.2 billion
over the administration’s budget request;
- eliminate the “Disabled Veterans Tax”
(authorize full concurrent receipt);
- authorize a $1,000 bonus for those who have
served in Operations Iraqi Freedom and Enduring
Freedom (Afghanistan); and
- increase educational and job training
benefits under the GI Bill.
“Just as soldiers leave no one behind on the
battlefield, we will leave no veteran behind
once they’ve come home,” Pelosi said.
Some bills already address a number of the
initiatives, including the SBP-DIC offset (S.
185, H.R. 808) and TRICARE for the Guard and
Reserve (S. 337, S. 32, H.R. 558).
MOAA President Vice Adm. Norbert R. Ryan Jr.,
USN-Ret., Norton, and more than a dozen other
organization representatives also met with
Senate Democratic Steering Committee leaders at
the Capitol in late April. Sen. Hillary Clinton
(D-N.Y.), chair of the Steering Committee, and
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.)
invited participants to present their views on
VA health care funding, including mental health
needs for returning veterans, support for
servicemembers, and other concerns.
Sens. Daniel Akaka (D-Hawaii), Ted Kennedy
(D-Mass.), John Kerry (D-Mass.), Mary Landrieu
(D-La.), Patty Murray (D-Wash.), Ken Salazar (D-Colo.),
and Debbie Stabenow (D-Mich.) also participated.
Ryan said there was an urgent need to increase
the Army’s and Marine Corps’ strength to relieve
enormous pressure on the all-volunteer force. He
warned that the force was in danger of “sliding
into a ditch” if action is not taken. Ryan also
thanked Clinton and Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.)
for sponsoring legislation to extend fee-based
TRICARE to all members of the National Guard and
Reserve and urged helping surviving spouses of
the war on terrorism by eliminating the SBP-DIC
offset.
Murray said there was a “train wreck” coming in
the VA health care system due to a shortage of
funds to treat thousands of new veterans from
the war on terrorism and to maintain commitments
to veterans of earlier conflicts. Murray earlier
had sponsored an unsuccessful amendment to
earmark $2 billion for VA care from the FY 2005
emergency supplemental funding measure.
Michael M. Faenza, president and CEO of the
National Mental Health Association, urged
increases to mental health services for
returning combat veterans, noting there is a
need for “stigma busting” over PTSD and other
mental health conditions in the military and
veterans’ community.
Other initiatives discussed included improving
support services for military families
(especially the Guard and Reserve), implementing
“seamless transition” initiatives for separating
servicemembers, and fixing the VA claims system.
— Contributors are Col. Steve Strobridge, usaf-Ret., director;
Col. Lee Lange, USMC-Ret.; Col. Bob Norton, USA-Ret.; Sue Schwartz,
DBA, RN; Cmdr. René Campos, USN-Ret.; Cmdr. John Class, USN-Ret.;
Cynthia Dougherty; and Maria Tutino, MOAA’s Government Relations
Department
|